I don't blog here as often as I should because everything I said was wrong about speed cameras has been proved to be true.
And today there's proof that speed cameras do not cut accidents - they cause them instead (Daily Mail story below).
It's only a small victory for us since we've been saying this since NuLieBore introduced them to raise cash (and not every speed camera partnership has supplied information for this survey which underlines just how hopeless they are).
Speed cameras have nothing to do with safety but instead just raise cash from motorists. We've been saying that most accidents occur within a mile of your home at a junction - and that's from the Dept for Transport's own figures (though they are also shy about revealing that speed is a factor in less than 5% of accidents).
Most of the police officers we know all say that education is the key to bringing down the accident figures. That and putting more police patrols on the street. Labour cut down on the number of patrolling officers and this is the price you pay. Speed cameras do not recognise drunk drivers for instance. It also explains why the accident rate was in decline before speed cameras were introduced and then rose afterwards.
Anyway, here's hoping that a lesson will be learned - but don't hold your breath!
Speed cameras 'do not cut accidents'... they create them, study finds
Many speed cameras have not cut accident rates and may even have increased them, figures reveal for the first time today.
Statistics published by the Department for Transport show many cameras have done little or nothing to improve accident rates, but have proved highly effective in clocking up speeding fines.
Only a small number of councils have agreed to publish the full data on each speed camera in their area.
But ministers will today urge all councils to follow suit – saying motorists have a right to know whether local speed cameras are justified.
Road safety minister Mike Penning said: ‘We are shining the light of transparency on the performance of speed cameras.
‘People want to know that if their tax money is being spent on speed cameras that they are actually making their roads safer, not just raising money.
‘They will now have the information to be able to hold their councils to account if they think that some cameras have actually made the situation worse, rather than better.’
Read more:
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
Friday, 11 March 2011
£60m paid in 'unfair' parking fines
I have very little sympathy for anyone who has paid an 'unfair' parking ticket. If you think it's unfair then don't pay it - fight it!
You must remember that a parking ticket isn't a fine in itself - it's a statement that someone believes you were parked wrongly.
If you contest the ticket there's a good chance that you will get off. Being too busy to bother doesn't really cut it for me - you need to fight for things like this otherwise you'll be getting tickets for every slight issue.
Captain Gatso
£60m paid in 'unfair' parking fines
Drivers lost almost £60 million last year by failing to appeal against unfair parking tickets, according to a survey.
In 2010, around 5% of motorists in the UK received a parking ticket where they had grounds for appeal, paying out an estimated £58.5 million, the poll by car insurer LV= found.
Of these, only 22% bothered to contest the ticket but of those who did, 88% were successful in their claim.
More than half (53%) who chose not to appeal said they assumed they would lose, while 8% did not know how to initiate a claim.
The poll of 2,003 adults, including 1,728 drivers, showed that the majority of unfair parking fines are issued in areas were parking signage is unclear.
A total of 2% of drivers said parking attendants had fabricated evidence to support the issuing of a ticket.
Nearly half (49%) of tickets issued unfairly are given out on public roads, while 10% are issued in car parks of public buildings managed by local councils, including libraries, hospitals and doctors' surgeries.
Also, 182,000 tickets issued unfairly last year came from unregulated private parking operators.
As many as 10% of motorists given an unfair ticket on privately-owned land said they had been threatened with court proceedings or debt recovery action if they did not pay up.
The average cost paid by motorists given a ticket in unfair circumstances was £42.
You must remember that a parking ticket isn't a fine in itself - it's a statement that someone believes you were parked wrongly.
If you contest the ticket there's a good chance that you will get off. Being too busy to bother doesn't really cut it for me - you need to fight for things like this otherwise you'll be getting tickets for every slight issue.
Captain Gatso
£60m paid in 'unfair' parking fines
Drivers lost almost £60 million last year by failing to appeal against unfair parking tickets, according to a survey.
In 2010, around 5% of motorists in the UK received a parking ticket where they had grounds for appeal, paying out an estimated £58.5 million, the poll by car insurer LV= found.
Of these, only 22% bothered to contest the ticket but of those who did, 88% were successful in their claim.
More than half (53%) who chose not to appeal said they assumed they would lose, while 8% did not know how to initiate a claim.
The poll of 2,003 adults, including 1,728 drivers, showed that the majority of unfair parking fines are issued in areas were parking signage is unclear.
A total of 2% of drivers said parking attendants had fabricated evidence to support the issuing of a ticket.
Nearly half (49%) of tickets issued unfairly are given out on public roads, while 10% are issued in car parks of public buildings managed by local councils, including libraries, hospitals and doctors' surgeries.
Also, 182,000 tickets issued unfairly last year came from unregulated private parking operators.
As many as 10% of motorists given an unfair ticket on privately-owned land said they had been threatened with court proceedings or debt recovery action if they did not pay up.
The average cost paid by motorists given a ticket in unfair circumstances was £42.
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
Home Office concedes Britain likely to become a surveillance state
We keep on warning people about what is happening; this sleepwalking into a police state and that the authorities won't let go of their powers too easily.
Here is a piece from an online news site which underlines what we here at MAD have been saying.
Captain Gatso
Faced with the quickening pace of technological development Ministers have claim that their election pledge to roll back the surveillance state will make it increasingly difficult to prevent such measures from becoming commonplace.
The warnings coincides with publication of consultation on plans for a code of practice to govern the introduction of such technologies, which includes giving the public the right to take councils to court if they believe CCTV surveillance is becoming too intrusive.
The Protection of Freedoms Bill will see a new Security Camera Commissioner established to vet a new breed of HD, 360 degree vision, zoom lens cameras equipped with facial recognition software didn’t overstep the mark.
Unmanned aerial drones were also looked at with the report stating “ there is scope for their unchecked proliferation and attendant risks if they are not considered within any overarching strategy”.
There are presently four million CCTV cameras in operation in the UK – one for every 14 citizens.
You need to read that last line again. We have more cameras than anywhere else on earth - why? And most of those cameras are sited in cities so the figure per person is sure to be horrific.
They aren't there to detect or prevent crime.
Here is a piece from an online news site which underlines what we here at MAD have been saying.
Captain Gatso
Faced with the quickening pace of technological development Ministers have claim that their election pledge to roll back the surveillance state will make it increasingly difficult to prevent such measures from becoming commonplace.
The warnings coincides with publication of consultation on plans for a code of practice to govern the introduction of such technologies, which includes giving the public the right to take councils to court if they believe CCTV surveillance is becoming too intrusive.
The Protection of Freedoms Bill will see a new Security Camera Commissioner established to vet a new breed of HD, 360 degree vision, zoom lens cameras equipped with facial recognition software didn’t overstep the mark.
Unmanned aerial drones were also looked at with the report stating “ there is scope for their unchecked proliferation and attendant risks if they are not considered within any overarching strategy”.
There are presently four million CCTV cameras in operation in the UK – one for every 14 citizens.
You need to read that last line again. We have more cameras than anywhere else on earth - why? And most of those cameras are sited in cities so the figure per person is sure to be horrific.
They aren't there to detect or prevent crime.
Saturday, 16 October 2010
What does firefighters' strike mean for anti-terrorist units and bonfire night?
Slightly off-topic but I think that Ross Lydall's blog raises a few interesting questions.
Let's hope that anyone thinking of carrying a very stupid act in London on a strike date will not be aware of its full implications.
Essentially there's not a lot we can do if it's a 'dirty bomb' or something similar.
Here's what Ross has to say....
The London firefighters' strike raises many questions. At one end there is the unresolved dilemma about who will take charge of the brigade's specialist CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear) units designed to handle all manner of terrorist atrocities.
At the other is the real fear of a lack of cover in the run-up to Bonfire night - a situation made worse by the cancellation of some council events, such as the Ally Pally fireworks, due to cutbacks.
Lambeth council has cancelled its events on Streatham Common and Brockwell Park, with only Clapham Common going ahead. Lewisham today told me that the Blackheath fireworks would go ahead - it has raised £11,000 of a £35,000 shortfall in funding, and the remainder will come from savings elsewhere if necessary. Wandsworth is advertising its Battersea Park event as normal.
Even if the FBU backs away from a walk-out on Bonfire night (it is thought likely that any action will be co-ordinated with the Tube strike due for November 2), brigade chiefs say that the risk of accidents increases in the week before November 5.
Read Ross' blog
Let's hope that anyone thinking of carrying a very stupid act in London on a strike date will not be aware of its full implications.
Essentially there's not a lot we can do if it's a 'dirty bomb' or something similar.
Here's what Ross has to say....
The London firefighters' strike raises many questions. At one end there is the unresolved dilemma about who will take charge of the brigade's specialist CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear) units designed to handle all manner of terrorist atrocities.
At the other is the real fear of a lack of cover in the run-up to Bonfire night - a situation made worse by the cancellation of some council events, such as the Ally Pally fireworks, due to cutbacks.
Lambeth council has cancelled its events on Streatham Common and Brockwell Park, with only Clapham Common going ahead. Lewisham today told me that the Blackheath fireworks would go ahead - it has raised £11,000 of a £35,000 shortfall in funding, and the remainder will come from savings elsewhere if necessary. Wandsworth is advertising its Battersea Park event as normal.
Even if the FBU backs away from a walk-out on Bonfire night (it is thought likely that any action will be co-ordinated with the Tube strike due for November 2), brigade chiefs say that the risk of accidents increases in the week before November 5.
Read Ross' blog
Monday, 4 October 2010
20mph limit has not made roads safer
Why does no-one listen to Motorists Against Detection? We told people years ago - even when Auto Express reported on the expansion of these schemes that making the roads 20mph doesn't work.
Because our views are unpalatable doesn't make us wrong.
There has to be an open and honest debate about bringing down the accident figures.
I say this is an easy process - and you only need to do things.
1. Put more police on the roads.
2. Improve driver education.
This is what today's Telegraph is saying:
Controversial 20mph speed limits in residential streets may not bring any significant improvement in road safety, a report published by the Department for Transport has found.
The number of people killed or seriously injured on affected roads actually went up, not down, after the limit was lowered claiming that they will cut the toll of deaths on the road.
However, an analysis of the UK's first city-wide scheme - in which the limit was lowered from 30mph to 20mph on all residential streets in Portsmouth, at a cost of £500,000 - found that it has not brought any significant reduction in the number of accidents.
Paul Watters, head of public affairs at the AA, said: "By just whacking up signs everywhere you are not going to change things dramatically.
"We support targeted and tailored 20mph zones where they are really needed, not a blanket implementation across a whole city.
"Sometimes the limits can be problematic because bus journey times are affected, and also there is an impact for delivery firms and everyone else driving in the city."
Read more
We despair! Stop taxing and harrassing motorists if you want road safety to improve. Focus on what made the UK's road the safest in the world - before the introduction of speed cameras and 20mph zones.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
Because our views are unpalatable doesn't make us wrong.
There has to be an open and honest debate about bringing down the accident figures.
I say this is an easy process - and you only need to do things.
1. Put more police on the roads.
2. Improve driver education.
This is what today's Telegraph is saying:
Controversial 20mph speed limits in residential streets may not bring any significant improvement in road safety, a report published by the Department for Transport has found.
The number of people killed or seriously injured on affected roads actually went up, not down, after the limit was lowered claiming that they will cut the toll of deaths on the road.
However, an analysis of the UK's first city-wide scheme - in which the limit was lowered from 30mph to 20mph on all residential streets in Portsmouth, at a cost of £500,000 - found that it has not brought any significant reduction in the number of accidents.
Paul Watters, head of public affairs at the AA, said: "By just whacking up signs everywhere you are not going to change things dramatically.
"We support targeted and tailored 20mph zones where they are really needed, not a blanket implementation across a whole city.
"Sometimes the limits can be problematic because bus journey times are affected, and also there is an impact for delivery firms and everyone else driving in the city."
Read more
We despair! Stop taxing and harrassing motorists if you want road safety to improve. Focus on what made the UK's road the safest in the world - before the introduction of speed cameras and 20mph zones.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
Thursday, 19 August 2010
Speed cameras to slow you down?
I was quoted in the Evening Standard yesterday for my view on speed cameras to govern 20mph zones.
This is a long-running issue and my thoughts are two-fold.
Firstly, 20mph zones bring a variety of issues for road safety (and not all good). The roads should be self-governing anyway since various traffic calming measures are introduced.
Secondly, I'm really worried about TFL's 'mission creep'. It starts out with security cameras and then become an ANPR network. These 20mph cameras will come in and then they are monitoring who was where, doing what and for how long. In addition, it's a cinch to bring in road tolling with this kind of network.
We don't want tolls but Boris and the TFL might have different ideas.
Here's what I said:
The campaigner known as “Captain Gatso”, from Motorists Against Detection, said: “Twenty and 30mph zones should already be self-policing because of traffic-calming measures. Average speed cameras are just another idea to keep the gravy train running for TfL.”
Read the Evening Standard story.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
speedaholics.com
This is a long-running issue and my thoughts are two-fold.
Firstly, 20mph zones bring a variety of issues for road safety (and not all good). The roads should be self-governing anyway since various traffic calming measures are introduced.
Secondly, I'm really worried about TFL's 'mission creep'. It starts out with security cameras and then become an ANPR network. These 20mph cameras will come in and then they are monitoring who was where, doing what and for how long. In addition, it's a cinch to bring in road tolling with this kind of network.
We don't want tolls but Boris and the TFL might have different ideas.
Here's what I said:
The campaigner known as “Captain Gatso”, from Motorists Against Detection, said: “Twenty and 30mph zones should already be self-policing because of traffic-calming measures. Average speed cameras are just another idea to keep the gravy train running for TfL.”
Read the Evening Standard story.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
speedaholics.com
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
More common sense from Richard Littlejohn on motoring laws
Here at MAD we quite Richard Littlejohn - over the years he has remained true to the cause of exposing the horror on Nu Liebour laws aimed raising cash from motorists.
He at least has always understood that the previous Govt of inepts were only interested in criminalising and fining large sections of the population.
In this column he lambasts the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, Julie Spence.
Among her latest targets are middle-class motorists, whom she is accusing of hypocrisy for objecting to speed cameras and parking tickets while demanding vociferously that police enforce the law in other areas.
Mrs Spence completely misses the point. What people object to is the arbitrary nature of the road traffic laws, which take no account of safety or local conditions and appear designed simply to turn otherwise law-abiding taxpayers into criminals, while at the same time maximising revenue through fixed-penalty fines spewed out by computer.
We also resent the constant attempts by police chiefs such as Mrs Spence to equate the ‘crime’ of driving perfectly safely at 78 mph on a deserted M11 with burglary, mugging and anti-social behaviour.
She epitomises the new breed of chief constable who sees policing as a cross between social work and big business and is scathing about the paying public’s longing for a Dixon Of Dock Green utopia.
Read more.
So let us repeat: to make our roads as safe as they were (before Tony Bliar took charge) we need MORE police on our roads not more speed cameras.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists' Friend
He at least has always understood that the previous Govt of inepts were only interested in criminalising and fining large sections of the population.
In this column he lambasts the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, Julie Spence.
Among her latest targets are middle-class motorists, whom she is accusing of hypocrisy for objecting to speed cameras and parking tickets while demanding vociferously that police enforce the law in other areas.
Mrs Spence completely misses the point. What people object to is the arbitrary nature of the road traffic laws, which take no account of safety or local conditions and appear designed simply to turn otherwise law-abiding taxpayers into criminals, while at the same time maximising revenue through fixed-penalty fines spewed out by computer.
We also resent the constant attempts by police chiefs such as Mrs Spence to equate the ‘crime’ of driving perfectly safely at 78 mph on a deserted M11 with burglary, mugging and anti-social behaviour.
She epitomises the new breed of chief constable who sees policing as a cross between social work and big business and is scathing about the paying public’s longing for a Dixon Of Dock Green utopia.
Read more.
So let us repeat: to make our roads as safe as they were (before Tony Bliar took charge) we need MORE police on our roads not more speed cameras.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists' Friend
Sunday, 25 July 2010
The Coalition Govt - we salute you!
News over the weekend that Govt spending cuts will see roadside cameras switrched off is good news for ALL motorists.
Let's see the end of speed camera partnerships (forget the word 'safety' in their titles because they aren't interested in road safety) and then return to the days when the UK had the safest roads in the world.
Is that too much to ask for?
Here's how Sky News tell the story:
Thousands of speed cameras could be switched off after the Government slashed cash for road safety by 40%
According to The Sunday Times, the first county likely to abandon the devices is Oxfordshire, which may shut down its 79 cameras as early as next week.
Other counties could do the same, with camera networks in Devon and Cornwall, Somerset and Northamptonshire also under review, the paper said.
About 6,000 speed cameras across the UK cost motorists an estimated £100m in fines a year. Oxfordshire's network raised more than £1m in 2009.
But the money goes to the Treasury despite local authorities complaining they should be able to keep the proceeds for spending on road safety.
The reduction in Government cash for road safety has prompted Oxfordshire officials to recommend a £600,000 cut in Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership funding.
The body, which operates the county's fixed speed cameras, has reportedly said it will no longer be able to afford them, if funding is slashed.
All the cameras will be switched off if county councillors ratify the cutback on Tuesday, the Times continued.
The reviews of camera networks follow a Government decision to claw back £38m from English local authorities' 2010-11 £95m road safety budget.
Road safety minister Mike Penning told the paper: "In the coalition agreement, the Government made clear it would end central funding for fixed speed cameras.
"This is another example of this government delivering on its pledge to end the war on the motorist.
"I would hope that councils will use the funds available to put in place new measures to tackle road safety problems."
Road safety charity Brake's Ellen Booth feared Oxfordshire's decision could prompt other councils to scrap speed cameras.
She was quoted as saying: "We're incredibly concerned in case this is more than an isolated incident. That would be a disaster for road safety and the public."
NO THIS WOULD NOT BE A DISASTER.
Motorists Against Detection wants to see more police on the roads to enforce the laws of the land AND an increase in driver education.
This really is a time for celebration!
Captain Gatso
The Motorists' Friend
Let's see the end of speed camera partnerships (forget the word 'safety' in their titles because they aren't interested in road safety) and then return to the days when the UK had the safest roads in the world.
Is that too much to ask for?
Here's how Sky News tell the story:
Thousands of speed cameras could be switched off after the Government slashed cash for road safety by 40%
According to The Sunday Times, the first county likely to abandon the devices is Oxfordshire, which may shut down its 79 cameras as early as next week.
Other counties could do the same, with camera networks in Devon and Cornwall, Somerset and Northamptonshire also under review, the paper said.
About 6,000 speed cameras across the UK cost motorists an estimated £100m in fines a year. Oxfordshire's network raised more than £1m in 2009.
But the money goes to the Treasury despite local authorities complaining they should be able to keep the proceeds for spending on road safety.
The reduction in Government cash for road safety has prompted Oxfordshire officials to recommend a £600,000 cut in Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership funding.
The body, which operates the county's fixed speed cameras, has reportedly said it will no longer be able to afford them, if funding is slashed.
All the cameras will be switched off if county councillors ratify the cutback on Tuesday, the Times continued.
The reviews of camera networks follow a Government decision to claw back £38m from English local authorities' 2010-11 £95m road safety budget.
Road safety minister Mike Penning told the paper: "In the coalition agreement, the Government made clear it would end central funding for fixed speed cameras.
"This is another example of this government delivering on its pledge to end the war on the motorist.
"I would hope that councils will use the funds available to put in place new measures to tackle road safety problems."
Road safety charity Brake's Ellen Booth feared Oxfordshire's decision could prompt other councils to scrap speed cameras.
She was quoted as saying: "We're incredibly concerned in case this is more than an isolated incident. That would be a disaster for road safety and the public."
NO THIS WOULD NOT BE A DISASTER.
Motorists Against Detection wants to see more police on the roads to enforce the laws of the land AND an increase in driver education.
This really is a time for celebration!
Captain Gatso
The Motorists' Friend
Friday, 9 July 2010
Speeding fines race to £87m
So here we go AGAIN.
Everything in this report in today's Sun repeats what we have been saying for at least the last five years.
Have people not been listening?
Let me repeat: there is NO EVIDENCE that speed cameras make the roads any safer. In fact, the statistics show that the great improvements this country had been making slowed - or got worse - AFTER the introduction of speed cameras. (The Govt played a statistical quirk game in which they showed the opposite but had to ignore some very basic statistical rules).
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!
Anyway, let The Sun spell it out for you.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
MOTORISTS were clobbered with more than £87million in fines last year after being nabbed by speed cameras.
But a new report today claims the explosion in the number of cameras has NOT made roads safer.
Instead, the steady drop in road casualties over the last 30 years SLOWED after they were introduced in 1991.
Hundreds of thousands of drivers were snapped speeding or jumping red lights last year.
They were fined a total of £87.4million, the report from the TaxPayers' Alliance shows.
London drivers paid nearly £6.3million - the highest in the country.
Read more
Everything in this report in today's Sun repeats what we have been saying for at least the last five years.
Have people not been listening?
Let me repeat: there is NO EVIDENCE that speed cameras make the roads any safer. In fact, the statistics show that the great improvements this country had been making slowed - or got worse - AFTER the introduction of speed cameras. (The Govt played a statistical quirk game in which they showed the opposite but had to ignore some very basic statistical rules).
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY!
Anyway, let The Sun spell it out for you.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
MOTORISTS were clobbered with more than £87million in fines last year after being nabbed by speed cameras.
But a new report today claims the explosion in the number of cameras has NOT made roads safer.
Instead, the steady drop in road casualties over the last 30 years SLOWED after they were introduced in 1991.
Hundreds of thousands of drivers were snapped speeding or jumping red lights last year.
They were fined a total of £87.4million, the report from the TaxPayers' Alliance shows.
London drivers paid nearly £6.3million - the highest in the country.
Read more
Thursday, 8 July 2010
Greedy Gatso on safe road row
Just when people think the Gatso row has died away there pops up another example of the greed of the 'safety camera' partnerships.
You won't need me to spell out why this camera is so wrong (but it's on a road without any RTAs and is a dual carriageway with a 30mph. Go figure).
But, goodness me, to rack yp £1.3m a year in fines on what is suppoed to be a SAFE road? Come on!
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
A SPEED camera on a road with a sparkling safety record has sparked fury — as it nets £1.3MILLION a year in fines.
The controversial camera, one of the most lucrative in Britain, has been catching an average 1,843 motorists a month — hitting each with a £60 ticket.
But the dual carriageway it sits on has had only ONE serious injury in ELEVEN YEARS.
Motoring groups have slammed it as a move to "milk the motorist" — claiming the 30mph is far too low for the road.
Thousands of drivers have been fined for driving at a few miles over 30mph, not realising the limit is so low.
Read more of The Sun story
You won't need me to spell out why this camera is so wrong (but it's on a road without any RTAs and is a dual carriageway with a 30mph. Go figure).
But, goodness me, to rack yp £1.3m a year in fines on what is suppoed to be a SAFE road? Come on!
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
A SPEED camera on a road with a sparkling safety record has sparked fury — as it nets £1.3MILLION a year in fines.
The controversial camera, one of the most lucrative in Britain, has been catching an average 1,843 motorists a month — hitting each with a £60 ticket.
But the dual carriageway it sits on has had only ONE serious injury in ELEVEN YEARS.
Motoring groups have slammed it as a move to "milk the motorist" — claiming the 30mph is far too low for the road.
Thousands of drivers have been fined for driving at a few miles over 30mph, not realising the limit is so low.
Read more of The Sun story
Monday, 5 July 2010
Crackdown on 'Big Brother' camera network for our roads after Home Secretary orders review
A review into the use of ANPR cameras is long overdue - and we don't expect them to be removed.
The police are now in charge and they don't want this to happen.
It's NOT about finding/tracking terrorists but about following ordinary people. NuLiebore just wanted control and the Coalition may think it's too good to give up.
Incredible that they were installed in the first place.
** I was going to comment on the decision to remove secret cameras which monitor the Muslim population of Birmingham. I've decided not to get embroiled in this one. Again, the cameras shouldn't have been put up and they are offensive. But they are offensive to all members of the population.
Read the ANPR story from the Daily Mail below.
Captain Gatso
Police face restrictions on the use of a 'Big Brother' network of thousands of cameras tracking up to 14million motorists a day.
The controversial Automatic Number Plate Recognition system takes photographs of car number plates, allowing officers to follow individual vehicles for hundreds of miles.
All details are logged on a central database, which has 7.6million records of the movements of motorists tracked by more than 4,000 cameras across the country.
Read more
The police are now in charge and they don't want this to happen.
It's NOT about finding/tracking terrorists but about following ordinary people. NuLiebore just wanted control and the Coalition may think it's too good to give up.
Incredible that they were installed in the first place.
** I was going to comment on the decision to remove secret cameras which monitor the Muslim population of Birmingham. I've decided not to get embroiled in this one. Again, the cameras shouldn't have been put up and they are offensive. But they are offensive to all members of the population.
Read the ANPR story from the Daily Mail below.
Captain Gatso
Police face restrictions on the use of a 'Big Brother' network of thousands of cameras tracking up to 14million motorists a day.
The controversial Automatic Number Plate Recognition system takes photographs of car number plates, allowing officers to follow individual vehicles for hundreds of miles.
All details are logged on a central database, which has 7.6million records of the movements of motorists tracked by more than 4,000 cameras across the country.
Read more
Thursday, 1 July 2010
Why the Police in the UK do not respect freedom or democracy
People keep telling me that I'm wrong on the Police State UK.
But the evidence keeps piling up. The problem is that the rozzers either don't understand the law - or keep on making it up as they go along.
Here are two cases from this week alone which illustrate why these clowns can do what they do without EVER being sacked.
Democracy? Bring it - it should make for a nice change in this country.
Case number 1:
Read how the police overstep the mark and then push a 15-year-old down some steps because he - RIGHTLY - tries to tell them what the law is: Journalism and this Hackney news site.
Here's the best bit for me:
Director of Big Brother Watch Alex Deane told Journalism.co.uk it would support Mattsson in any future cases against the police.
"Some officers think that anti-terror legislation gives them blanket powers to hassle people whenever they want," he says. "This case is a very bad example of that. Confronted by bullying policemen, acting entirely outside their powers, this young man admirably stood up for himself and rightly maintained that he was entitled to take pictures in a public place. The police should apologise immediately and admit that they were in the wrong."
Case number 2:
Journalists win payout after police admit failing to respect press freedom - The Guardian
Watch this idiot in action. They really don't care about freedoms do they? Can they really believe it's always 'us and them'. At this rate it soon will be.
Captain Gatso
But the evidence keeps piling up. The problem is that the rozzers either don't understand the law - or keep on making it up as they go along.
Here are two cases from this week alone which illustrate why these clowns can do what they do without EVER being sacked.
Democracy? Bring it - it should make for a nice change in this country.
Case number 1:
Read how the police overstep the mark and then push a 15-year-old down some steps because he - RIGHTLY - tries to tell them what the law is: Journalism and this Hackney news site.
Here's the best bit for me:
Director of Big Brother Watch Alex Deane told Journalism.co.uk it would support Mattsson in any future cases against the police.
"Some officers think that anti-terror legislation gives them blanket powers to hassle people whenever they want," he says. "This case is a very bad example of that. Confronted by bullying policemen, acting entirely outside their powers, this young man admirably stood up for himself and rightly maintained that he was entitled to take pictures in a public place. The police should apologise immediately and admit that they were in the wrong."
Case number 2:
Journalists win payout after police admit failing to respect press freedom - The Guardian
Watch this idiot in action. They really don't care about freedoms do they? Can they really believe it's always 'us and them'. At this rate it soon will be.
Captain Gatso
Wednesday, 30 June 2010
'Most dangerous' roads in Britain named by safety group
So here we go again.
The most dangerous roads in the UK are not highways but junctions. AS WE HAVE TOLD PEOPLE FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS (OR MORE).
And what doesn't appear from the news coverage is that the danger point for motoring accidents is at a junction LESS THAN A MILE FROM YOUR HOME.
Here's part of the story:
Junction danger
It examined accident data relating to roads across Britain. Among the Road Safety Foundation conclusions were:
A third of all fatal and serious crashes happen at junctions
Single roads carry six times the risk of motorways and twice that of dual carriageways
One-in-four fatal or serious crashes on A-roads or motorways involves a motorcyclist
There was a 5% reduction in the number of fatal crashes on such roads in the past three years
Read more
Captain Gatso
The most dangerous roads in the UK are not highways but junctions. AS WE HAVE TOLD PEOPLE FOR THE PAST FIVE YEARS (OR MORE).
And what doesn't appear from the news coverage is that the danger point for motoring accidents is at a junction LESS THAN A MILE FROM YOUR HOME.
Here's part of the story:
Junction danger
It examined accident data relating to roads across Britain. Among the Road Safety Foundation conclusions were:
A third of all fatal and serious crashes happen at junctions
Single roads carry six times the risk of motorways and twice that of dual carriageways
One-in-four fatal or serious crashes on A-roads or motorways involves a motorcyclist
There was a 5% reduction in the number of fatal crashes on such roads in the past three years
Read more
Captain Gatso
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
How the police can save a fortune - without sacking officers
I see that today the funding of police forces comes into the searchlight.
As we have said before at speedaholics (mainly on the blog) the police don't need to be running around in top-of-the-range cars.
Why does an Inspector need a fancy BMW?
At one point on Speedaholics we actually gave details of the luxury cars and their number plates which were spotted in the police station car parks.
It might be worth doing this again just to underline how the police waste their resources.
Let's not feel too bad for them - times have been good under Labour.
Unheard of new powers; the biggest police force in history; the biggest overtime budget EVER and a crass approach to dealing with the public as 'the enemy'.
It's going to take the police service years to put right the damage they have caused in their relationship between them and the public.
As motorists we are pleased to see their wallets being attacked without any recourse to whether it's right or wrong.
Now you know how the general public feels.
Captain Gatso
As we have said before at speedaholics (mainly on the blog) the police don't need to be running around in top-of-the-range cars.
Why does an Inspector need a fancy BMW?
At one point on Speedaholics we actually gave details of the luxury cars and their number plates which were spotted in the police station car parks.
It might be worth doing this again just to underline how the police waste their resources.
Let's not feel too bad for them - times have been good under Labour.
Unheard of new powers; the biggest police force in history; the biggest overtime budget EVER and a crass approach to dealing with the public as 'the enemy'.
It's going to take the police service years to put right the damage they have caused in their relationship between them and the public.
As motorists we are pleased to see their wallets being attacked without any recourse to whether it's right or wrong.
Now you know how the general public feels.
Captain Gatso
Monday, 28 June 2010
Parking wardens giving out 'illegal' fines to hit targets
If ever you need any reasons to fully understand why we at Motorists Aganist Detection are so fed-up with motorists being the centre of fundraising tactics then this story explains it all.
We are an easy terget and we have few legal rights to combat false speed and parking tickets. The authorities have been abusing us for years and here's the truth from the Daily Mail.....
Motorists have been tricked into paying tens of thousands of pounds in 'illegal' parking tickets issued so that wardens can meet targets.
Thousands of the wrongful tickets have been paid by drivers who were unaware that they should have been cancelled by the council contractors who dole them out.
Read more.
This is fraud! People should be arrested! And will the finesbe handed back? We don't think so.
As we say: always, ALWAYS contest a parking or a speeding ticket. They are often wrong.
We are an easy terget and we have few legal rights to combat false speed and parking tickets. The authorities have been abusing us for years and here's the truth from the Daily Mail.....
Motorists have been tricked into paying tens of thousands of pounds in 'illegal' parking tickets issued so that wardens can meet targets.
Thousands of the wrongful tickets have been paid by drivers who were unaware that they should have been cancelled by the council contractors who dole them out.
Read more.
This is fraud! People should be arrested! And will the finesbe handed back? We don't think so.
As we say: always, ALWAYS contest a parking or a speeding ticket. They are often wrong.
Friday, 14 May 2010
War on motorists to end
It's the news that everyone here at Motorists Against Detection have been waiting for - the new Govt will end the war on motorists.
No more cash for speed cameras is great news; and now they need to disband the camera partnerships and their 'jobs for the boys' mentality.
The UK had the safest roads in the world until Nu Liebore took office.
Perhaps we can go back to those days and stop trying to fleece the motorists to fund barmy schemes.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
NEW Transport Secretary Philip Hammond vowed to "end the war on motorists" yesterday.
He promised there would be no tolls on existing roads, no more government funding for speed cameras, and consultation on a "stabiliser" mechanism to bring down fuel duty when petrol prices rise.
Mr Hammond said: "Motoring has to get greener, but the car is not going to go away."
Read more of The Sun story.
No more cash for speed cameras is great news; and now they need to disband the camera partnerships and their 'jobs for the boys' mentality.
The UK had the safest roads in the world until Nu Liebore took office.
Perhaps we can go back to those days and stop trying to fleece the motorists to fund barmy schemes.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
NEW Transport Secretary Philip Hammond vowed to "end the war on motorists" yesterday.
He promised there would be no tolls on existing roads, no more government funding for speed cameras, and consultation on a "stabiliser" mechanism to bring down fuel duty when petrol prices rise.
Mr Hammond said: "Motoring has to get greener, but the car is not going to go away."
Read more of The Sun story.
Saturday, 24 April 2010
Town that scrapped 'motorist tax' speed cameras sees no increase in accidents
This story in the Daily Mail is almost too good to be true.
Proof, if ever any were needed, that what we at Motorists Against Detection have been saying for years - SPEED CAMERAS DO NOT WORK THEY ARE THERE TO RAISE CASH.
Get the message?
Good. Now let's remove them where they aren't needed and be honest about why they are there in the first place.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
The first town in Britain to scrap fixed speed cameras has seen no increase in accidents, it was revealed yesterday.
But the number of motorists prosecuted for speeding there dropped by more than 40 per cent.
Swindon switched off its cameras over claims they were a ' blatant tax on the motorist' which did nothing to improve safety.
Read more
Proof, if ever any were needed, that what we at Motorists Against Detection have been saying for years - SPEED CAMERAS DO NOT WORK THEY ARE THERE TO RAISE CASH.
Get the message?
Good. Now let's remove them where they aren't needed and be honest about why they are there in the first place.
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
The first town in Britain to scrap fixed speed cameras has seen no increase in accidents, it was revealed yesterday.
But the number of motorists prosecuted for speeding there dropped by more than 40 per cent.
Swindon switched off its cameras over claims they were a ' blatant tax on the motorist' which did nothing to improve safety.
Read more
Sunday, 18 April 2010
Bring on the fuel protests
At last! People are being stirred into action.
How many people will support the latest bid to avoid filling up on 1 May?
To be honest, not many.
But Nu Liebore will be fuming that the protest to highlight fuel costs takes place just a few days before the election.
Remember: the inept, lying Government trousers 76p for every litre sold.
So let's support the bankers bonuses and keep on paying!
Apparently, haulage firms in the North-East and activists Farmers For Action are also planning demos. Various people have been in touch for me to take a lead on this but I need more people to step forward.
Also people need to be aware that Tony Blair changed the law on these protests.
Captain Gatso,
The Motorists Friend
We're net buying petrol there
Read the News of the World story:
ANGRY motorists are planning mass protests against petrol prices just DAYS before the election.
A huge Facebook campaign is mobilising half a million drivers to boycott pumps in demos which could be devastating for Gordon Brown as Britain goes to the polls.
It comes after a series of unpopular tax hikes in recent months sent petrol soaring to 120.8p a litre this week - up from 94.9p only a YEAR ago - with the Government pocketing 76p for every litre sold.
How many people will support the latest bid to avoid filling up on 1 May?
To be honest, not many.
But Nu Liebore will be fuming that the protest to highlight fuel costs takes place just a few days before the election.
Remember: the inept, lying Government trousers 76p for every litre sold.
So let's support the bankers bonuses and keep on paying!
Apparently, haulage firms in the North-East and activists Farmers For Action are also planning demos. Various people have been in touch for me to take a lead on this but I need more people to step forward.
Also people need to be aware that Tony Blair changed the law on these protests.
Captain Gatso,
The Motorists Friend
We're net buying petrol there
Read the News of the World story:
ANGRY motorists are planning mass protests against petrol prices just DAYS before the election.
A huge Facebook campaign is mobilising half a million drivers to boycott pumps in demos which could be devastating for Gordon Brown as Britain goes to the polls.
It comes after a series of unpopular tax hikes in recent months sent petrol soaring to 120.8p a litre this week - up from 94.9p only a YEAR ago - with the Government pocketing 76p for every litre sold.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Angry Britain blogs on petrol price
I think this writer manages to sum up how many people feel on the subject of petrol prices.
Good work Angry Britain!
Read his blog
And talking about being angry.
Can the BBC News stop being the mouthpiece for a discredited government?
On the News at Ten last Thursday, the anchor threw to a reporter standing outside a petrol station and they discussed that oil is priced in dollars and that it flucuates and that prices will most certainly go UP!
Can I just point out, yet again, that petrol prices could come DOWN tonight if the Government adjusted its 80% tax rate.
Or is that all a bit too simple?
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
Good work Angry Britain!
Read his blog
And talking about being angry.
Can the BBC News stop being the mouthpiece for a discredited government?
On the News at Ten last Thursday, the anchor threw to a reporter standing outside a petrol station and they discussed that oil is priced in dollars and that it flucuates and that prices will most certainly go UP!
Can I just point out, yet again, that petrol prices could come DOWN tonight if the Government adjusted its 80% tax rate.
Or is that all a bit too simple?
Captain Gatso
The Motorists Friend
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
£100k bill to get off a £60 ticket
Good luck to Neil in this fight. It's been ongoing for a while so he deserves every respect.
The local authorities are fighting it all the way in the knowledge they can't legally defend themselves.
They hide behind the notion that the laws are 'too complicated to implement'.
How come there wasn't a problem when the police were responsible?
The answer is that the councils got greedy and relied on the UK population not fighting back.
To a large we haven't but there's a sting in the tail coming very, very soon....
Captain Gatso
A PARKING crusader waging the biggest ever war against traffic wardens has shelled out £100,000 - to fight a £60 ticket.
Neil Herron, 47, has already re-mortgaged his £200,000 home to fund the landmark legal battle.
And now he's flogging his car - along with the appropriate personalised numberplate F1 NED.
Read the News of the World story
The local authorities are fighting it all the way in the knowledge they can't legally defend themselves.
They hide behind the notion that the laws are 'too complicated to implement'.
How come there wasn't a problem when the police were responsible?
The answer is that the councils got greedy and relied on the UK population not fighting back.
To a large we haven't but there's a sting in the tail coming very, very soon....
Captain Gatso
A PARKING crusader waging the biggest ever war against traffic wardens has shelled out £100,000 - to fight a £60 ticket.
Neil Herron, 47, has already re-mortgaged his £200,000 home to fund the landmark legal battle.
And now he's flogging his car - along with the appropriate personalised numberplate F1 NED.
Read the News of the World story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
